UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Mystery >

Arsène Lupin

Arsène Lupin (1932)

February. 26,1932
|
6.9
|
NR
| Mystery Romance

A charming and very daring thief known as Arsene Lupin is terrorizing the wealthy of Paris, he even goes so far as to threaten the Mona Lisa. But the police, led by the great Guerchard, think they know Arsene Lupin's identity, and they have a secret weapon to catch him.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Similar titles

Reviews

Nonureva
1932/02/26

Really Surprised!

More
Helloturia
1932/02/27

I have absolutely never seen anything like this movie before. You have to see this movie.

More
Tayyab Torres
1932/02/28

Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.

More
Kirandeep Yoder
1932/02/29

The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

More
blanche-2
1932/03/01

During the filming of Rasputin and the Emperor, Lionel Barrymore kept calling the director from a phone booth, asking him to tell John Barrymore not to put his hand on Lionel's wrist as it stole focus. I guess you had to watch that John like a hawk.John is the Duke of Charmerace aka Arsene Lupin, and Lionel is the hapless Guerchard who is under great pressure to capture him, as he's stealing right and left. But the Duke keeps beating him every time.Arsene Lupin has a bigger goal than a few jewels - the Mona Lisa from the Louvre. What the script writers didn't realize is that you can't roll up the Mona Lisa, she was painted on wood. Karen Morley is on hand as someone Guerchard sends in to help capture Lupin.The entire film is very sophisticated with fun moments. John and Lionel are great and obviously having a good time.

More
drjgardner
1932/03/02

Among the Barrymores, Lionel (1878-1954) was the oldest and my favorite, followed by Ethel (1879-1959) and then John (1882-1942). The 3 made only 1 film together (Rasputin) but John and Lionel made several, including Grand Hotel (1932), Dinner at Eight (1933), and Night Flight (1933).Arsene Lupin was John's first film with Lionel and his first film for MGM. He has lost his chiseled good looks, put on a little weight, and the dissipation is only slightly in view, and in the next few years it would be more noticeable. Lionel's problems with arthritis are also slightly in view here, and also would worsen with time. Eventually he would perform in a wheelchair.The film itself is pretty poor, with a wandering plot and a lot of wasted time. Karen Morley gives an enchanting performance as the love interest.What I like best about this film is the relationship of John and Lionel. It shows them playing off one another and some true filial affection.

More
Michael_Elliott
1932/03/03

Arsene Lupin (1932) *** (out of 4) When John Barrymore got out of his contract with Warner, MGM wasted no time in signing him and even lesser time in putting him in a film with his brother Lionel. This was the first of five films they'd make together and their easy to spot rivalry really makes this film the charming gem that it is. An elderly detective (Lionel) is convinced that the Duke of Charmerace (John) is the infamous jewel thief known as Arsene Lupin. The detective will stop at nothing to prove his thoughts and that includes bringing in a sexy spy (Karen Morley). The story itself isn't anything ground breaking or Oscar-worthy but it is good enough to build up two nice characters and then stand back and let the actors do all the work. Fans of the brothers will certainly get a kick out of seeing the two men working together as both deliver very strong performances and they really make this film worth seeking out. What works best is the comic timing that the two men bring to the table as well as their rivalry. Each scene that the two men are in you can tell that they are trying to out act the other and this adds a charm that no two other actors could have captured. Just take a look at the sequence at the start when Lionel arrests John thinking that he's lying about being the Duke. Just watch this scene and then compare it to a later scene where John is holding Lionel captive until he can prove that he's really a cop. Morley also fits into the threesome quite well as she has an undeniable sexual tension with John and some fun comic touches with Lionel. The scene where she introduces herself to the Duke while naked in his bed is a pre-code gem. Some could argue that a stronger "story" would have helped matters and it might have but the cast doesn't even bother to speak with French accents so there's no doubt that the studio was just trying to get the two men in the same film. The ending packs a terrific punch as everything gets closed up very tightly and in a way that everyone, including the viewer, wins.

More
Neil Doyle
1932/03/04

JOHN BARRYMORE actually underplays the role of ARSENE LUPIN in this early talkie that features his brother LIONEL BARRYMORE as a crusty detective seeking to solve a series of jewel robberies. John Barrymore is the elegant man suspected of being the famed jewel thief and he plays it with a surprising amount of charm and skill, rather than the overacting he often displayed in later films.KAREN MORLEY is the attractive blonde who is supposed to be helping Lionel get the goods on the thief--but, unfortunately, she's no help at all when she falls hopelessly in love with the charming scoundrel.So much about the film, where much of the action takes place on a country estate with wealthy people in attendance, reminds me of the David Niven/Olivia de Havilland film about the Scotland Yard thief RAFFLES. Barrymore plays the role with the same effortless charm that Niven adapted for his Raffles, the man who kept authorities baffled with a string of jewel robberies.TCM is showing a good print of the film and while some of the dialog leaves a lot to be desired, it's a good example of an early sound film that still holds up today. Interior sets of the country estate are expensively mounted and it's obvious this was designed as a major film, not a programmer, despite the slight story.Lionel hams it up considerably throughout, but John is more effective in his underplayed role.

More