UNLIMITED STREAMING
WITH PRIME VIDEO
TRY 30-DAY TRIAL
Home > Animation >

Stuart Little 3: Call of the Wild

Stuart Little 3: Call of the Wild (2006)

February. 21,2006
|
4.3
|
G
| Animation Comedy Family

With school out for the summer, The Littles are vacationing in a cabin by the lake, and Stuart is so excited he could burst! But when Snowbell the cat is captured by a mean-spirited creature known simply as the Beast, it's up to Stuart and a skunk named Reeko to rescue him and a few other friends.

...

Watch Trailer

Cast

Reviews

Diagonaldi
2006/02/21

Very well executed

More
Exoticalot
2006/02/22

People are voting emotionally.

More
Smartorhypo
2006/02/23

Highly Overrated But Still Good

More
ScoobyMint
2006/02/24

Disappointment for a huge fan!

More
Nicole Righton
2006/02/25

After seeing the first two movies and watching the hell out of them as a kid, I heard quite a few years later that there was a 3rd movie and got excited but also a little confused as into why I had never heard of the 3rd installment to the Stuart Little film series. I now know why..it is an embarrassment! I couldn't even watch half of the movie because it was just plain terrible, I probably only watched about 15-20 minutes of it and switched it over to another channel.Obviously the main question is why the hell this was in crappy CGI and not a mix of live action with good CGI like it was the first and second movie. I don't think anyone knows this answer but to be honest it would probably be due to low budget and this movie's purpose was to try and cash in on money. The animation looked unfinished though I do see what angle they were trying to go for, but for a MOVIE? And a prequel at that, it's just not good enough. This type of animation would be better for a TV show not a movie.Though I have to say that it's good to hear Hugh Laurie and M.J Fox back as their roles though obviously not all of the original actors could be in this film, I say they dodged a bullet. The voice acting (from what I heard) was actually good and didn't disappoint me, so I have no real issues with them.From what I saw this movie was a typical family trip that goes wrong in some way and that there are a lot of side stories such as George seemingly taking a liking to a girl at the camp, Snowbell getting scared of a myth and Stuart...doing something (I dunno I never got far enough into the film to find out), and Mr and Mrs Little..disappearing in convience of the plot.Overall, if you are a Stuart Little fan then just plain skip this! It is a disgrace to the franchise and I will hopefully be forgetting about it by tomorrow when I FINALLY see The Lego Movie in the cinema tomorrow. Just plain skip skip skip!

More
nickmedford
2006/02/26

After the first two films, with their lavish sets, excellent acting, and state-of-the-art CGI, this comes as a massive disappointment. It's an ultra-low budget animation, so poorly drawn that it looks like a rough draft rather than a finished animation. The cast who played the Little family in the previous films return to voice their characters here, but the dubbing is so haphazard that you'll swear that different actors were used. The plot is paper-thin, the jokes are mostly lame, and even the very young are likely to get bored well before the end. A great shame, as the first Stuart Little in particular was a great hit with my daughter, and one of the best children's films of recent years. Stuart Little 3 is, however, best avoided.

More
The_Wagon
2006/02/27

Stuart Little 3 has flaws. The animation. I don't like the animation. Ultimate Avengers is better. Way better. But Stuart Little 3 has good things about it, too. It starts with the Little family going on a camping trip. They drive there, Stuart has some adventures, and fights "The Beast". No, not the X-Men character, but...well....I'm not gonna spoil it for you! But I'll give you hint of what "The Beast" is. It's not a flounder! So that eliminates all the flounders of the world. What animal could it be? Watch this movie and find out! Now, I honestly thought this would suck, but it didn't. It was a nice little movie that's fun for the whole family. The first two were better, but this one was still a good movie. So just pop it in the DVD player and watch. They might make a Stuart Little 4. Who knows? 6/10.

More
mzatzman0327
2006/02/28

this movie is for kids ages 3-10. it is not for older children or adults. children in the proper age group will really like this movie as they know the main characters already and the story is at their level. It should not be called the third movie in the series as it is an animated movie not meant for all audiences. My young children enjoyed it much more than their parents. This looks like a trial for a TV animated series and is something you would expect to find on television. It is not a Disney quality movie but it still appeals to young kids who relate to the characters, especially Stuart Little, who is voiced by Michael J. Fox.He does a great job as usual.

More